<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Cultural strategies and local cultural decision making</title>
    <subTitle>research paper</subTitle>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Wright, John</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="corporate">
    <namePart>Culture Commons</namePart>
  </name>
  <name type="corporate">
    <namePart>Centre for Cultural Value</namePart>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">uk</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Leeds]</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <publisher>Centre for Cultural Value</publisher>
    <publisher>Culture Commons</publisher>
    <dateIssued>2024</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">electronic</form>
    <form authority="gmd">Recurs electrònic</form>
    <extent>26 p. : digital, fitxer PDF (4,81 Mb)</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>This research was produced by the Centre for Cultural Value as part of ‘the future of local cultural decision making’ – an open policy development programme led by Culture Commons on behalf of a UK-wide consortium of partners. The study of cultural strategies remains an emergent field and this paper consolidates current research and scholarly discussion on the subject. This paper then applies a thematic analysis to three micro-case studies of local authorities in order to provide an indicative set of implications for policy. The central research theme of this paper is evaluation of cultural strategies with particular focus on process and representation, scale, instigators, evaluation methods and reporting. Drawing on current research in the field conducted by Dan Ashton and Makanani Bell (2023), Ali FitzGibbon and Kim-Marie Spence (2023) this paper argues for a more localised and collaborative understanding of evaluation in practice and theory that captures outcomes and the nuances of different value systems rather than outputs-based reporting. (Font: Autor)</abstract>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">John Wright</note>
  <note xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.ca">Creative Commons CC BY - NC - SA https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.ca</note>
  <identifier type="uri">https://www.culturecommons.uk/s/R1-John-Wright_Research-Paper_Cultural-Strategies.pdf</identifier>
  <identifier type="uri">https://interaccio.diba.cat/news/2025/02/cultural-strategies</identifier>
  <location>
    <url>https://www.culturecommons.uk/s/R1-John-Wright_Research-Paper_Cultural-Strategies.pdf</url>
  </location>
  <location>
    <url>https://interaccio.diba.cat/news/2025/02/cultural-strategies</url>
  </location>
  <accessCondition type="useAndReproduction">Creative Commons</accessCondition>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">ES-BaOER</recordContentSource>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">250721</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20250721135011.0</recordChangeDate>
    <recordIdentifier source="ES-BaOER">47424</recordIdentifier>
    <languageOfCataloging>
      <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">cat</languageTerm>
    </languageOfCataloging>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
