000			03052naa a2200253 i 4500
001			47302
003			ES-BaOER
005			20241129091402.0
007			cr |||||||||||
008			241127s2024 sz |||||s|||| 0|| ||eng d
024			_a10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103239
040			_aES-BaOER _bcat _cES-BaOER
100	1		_aPotter, Emily _918680
245	1	0	_aActivating rural infrastructures in regional communities: cultural funding, silo art works and the challenge of local benefit _h[Recurs electrònic] / _cEmily Potter, Katya Johanson, D’Arcy Molan
300			_a11 p. : digital, fitxer PDF (6,11 Mb)
520			_aThis article examines the issues involved in publicly funded regional arts initiatives, through two contrasting examples of art works that creatively repurpose grain silos in rural Australia: the Silo Art Trail in north-west Victoria, and the silo art practices of the small town of Natimuk in the same region. Via desktop analysis supported by observation and interviews, we consider these initiatives in the context of a turn to arts-led regeneration and creative place-making in rural and regional development approaches and the role of public cultural policy within this. With the majority of public funding for cultural and creative projects in regional communities coming from urban-based governments in Australia (eg federal and state governments), decisions tend to be informed by urban-centric frameworks. Public cultural funding programmes often expect to develop projects that create jobs and generate market demand for creative products that will ensure creative enterprises are economically sustainable. This overlooks broader economic impacts and non-economic values that arts activities bring to rural and regional places, resulting in a misalignment between funding intention and outcomes. A lack of equity inherent in the relationship between urban-generated cultural funding approaches and regional priorities suggests a need for a rethink, to better understand and develop policies for creative practice in the regions that are driven by and responsive to regional priorities and capacities. (Font: Autor)
540			_aCreative Commons _fCC BY _uhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.ca
595			_aAbstract -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Cultural policy and regional development: 2.1. Urban bias in policy and its consequences for regional cultures ; 2.2. From community to economic development ; 2.3. The distinctive role of arts In Non-Metropolitan areas ; 2.4. A brief history of Australian grain silos -- 3. Methodology -- 4. The silo art trail: 4.1. Silo art trail: expectations and outcomes -- 5. 5 Natimuk silo art: 5.1. Natimuk ephemeral art: expectations and outcomes -- 6. Concluding discussion -- Interviews -- References
700	1		_aJohanson, Katya _93249
700	1		_aMolan, D’Arcy _918681
773	0		_7nnas _tJournal of rural studies, _gVol. 106 (Feb. 2024), 103239 _x0743-0167
856			_zE-Link _uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016724000433
942			_cEA
999			_c47302 _d47302