000			02595naa a2200253 i 4500
001			47457
003			ES-BaOER
005			20250926150620.0
007			cr |||||||||||
008			250926s2025 xxu|||||s|||||||| ||eng|d
024			_a10.1016/j.poetic.2024.101963
040			_aES-BaOER _bcat _cES-BaOER
100	1		_aMartín Zamorano, Mariano _93173
245	1	4	_aThe Problem of socio-territorial inequality in cultural policies: unveiling policy frames through Barcelona policies (2019–2023) _h[Recurs electrònic] / _cMariano Martín Zamorano Barrios, Nicolás Barbieri Muttis
300			_a13 p. : digital, fitxer PDF (563,11 Kb)
520			_aThis article examines how cultural policy frames embody and shape inequalities in cultural participation within urban settings. It explores both historical and contemporary policy frames, scrutinizing various approaches to cultural democratization and intersectional equity. From this perspective, we study how the cultural policies advanced by the Barcelona City Council framed inequalities in urban cultural participation and access to culture. The research employs thematic analysis of Barcelona’s cultural policy documents and relevant stakeholder interviews to evaluate these frames’ problem definition, prognosis, and collective action components. On this basis, the article identifies three main policy frames: constitutive, participatory, and intersectional, which are contrasted with policies implemented in the city from 2019 to 2023, including both pre- and post-COVID-19. The results reveal that although the local administration’s policy frame broadly aligns with strategies and narratives of multidimensional participation and pro-intersectional equity frames, it also embeds tensions within and between specific social stratification and constitutive components of cultural policy design. (Font: Autor)
540			_aCreative Commons _fCC BY - NC - ND _uhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
595			_aAbstract -- Keywords -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Methodology: materials and methods -- 3. Cultural policy and inequality: three dominant policy frames -- 4. Barcelona’s cultural policies: framing the period 2019–2023 -- 5. Discussion -- 6. Conclusions -- References
700	1		_aBarbieri, Nicolás _93807
773	0		_7nnas _tPoetics, _gVol. 108 (Febr. 2025), 101963 _x0304-422X _w(ES-BaOER)vtls000006981
856			_zE-Link _uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304422X24001013?via%3Dihub
856			_zInteracció _uhttps://interaccio.diba.cat/news/2025/08/desigualtat
942			_cEA
999			_c47457 _d47457